<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>stuff &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.beford.org/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.beford.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave &#8211; Make your friends logout gadget</title>
		<link>http://blog.beford.org/2009/11/20/google-wave-make-your-friends-logout-gadget/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.beford.org/2009/11/20/google-wave-make-your-friends-logout-gadget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fernando M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[csrf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xml]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beford.org/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adding this gadget to any wave will make people log out when they see it: http://beford.org/stuff/waveg.xml The code: &#60;script type="text/javascript"&#62; top.location="https://wave.google.com/wave/logout"; &#60;/script&#62;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding this gadget to any wave will make people log out when they see it:</p>
<p><a href="http://beford.org/stuff/waveg.xml">http://beford.org/stuff/waveg.xml</a></p>
<p>The code:</p>
<p><code>&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;<br />
top.location="https://wave.google.com/wave/logout";<br />
&lt;/script&gt;</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beford.org/2009/11/20/google-wave-make-your-friends-logout-gadget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Cross Site Scripting</title>
		<link>http://blog.beford.org/2008/05/04/gmail-cross-site-scripting/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.beford.org/2008/05/04/gmail-cross-site-scripting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fernando M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Español]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gecko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beford.org/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[El dia de hoy les traigo un pequeño descubrimiento, una vulnerabilidad en el sistema de Presentaciones (para los burros, powerpoint) en linea de Google Mail. El problema es sencillo, y no le tomara mucho tiempo arreglar a los de Mountain View, pero hay algo que me preocupa más. Describire el problema de Gmail rapidamente para poder pasar al detalle del plugin de flash. <a href="http://blog.beford.org/2008/05/04/gmail-cross-site-scripting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El dia de hoy les traigo un pequeño descubrimiento, una vulnerabilidad en el sistema de Presentaciones (para los burros, powerpoint) en linea de Google Mail. El problema es sencillo, y no le tomara mucho tiempo arreglar a los de Mountain View, pero hay algo que me preocupa más. Describire el problema de Gmail rapidamente para poder pasar al detalle del plugin de flash.</p>
<p>Google Slideshows no esta filtrando los hipervinculos de las presentaciones cuyo destino es una URI javascript:, con solo crear un simple enlace, colocarle como destino <em>javascript:alert(1)</em> e insertarlo en la presentacion, es posible ejecutar javascript en el contexto de mail.google.com. Para los que quieran verlo en funcionamiento he preparado un sencillo poc que envia las cookies a un sitio remoto (que no existe), tendrian que enviarse <a href="http://beford.org/stuff/mozilla.ppt">este archivo</a> por correo, y luego verlo en modo de Presentacion desde Gmail.</p>
<p>Aqui es donde entra el detalle, estos enlaces son creados como objetos tipo flash, y son llamados para abrirse en una ventana nueva, mediante el parametro &#8216;_blank&#8217;. Aparentemente cada navegador maneja de manera distinta y son los culpables de este problema. Por ejemplo con este <a href="http://beford.org/stuff/geturl.swf">archivo</a>, al clickear el recuadro que enlaza a javascript:alert(document.domain), Firefox, aunque abre una nueva ventana con el contexto about:blank, internamente no actualiza el contexto de ejecucion por completo y es posible acceder a ciertos objetos del DOM (document.cookie, document.domain) pero no a otros (XMLHttpRequest). Opera por otra parte, crea la nueva ventana, pero al ejecutar la javascript uri, lo realiza en la misma ventana donde se origino el evento, comprometiendo completamente el contexto del sitio que hostea el objeto flash. En versiones anteriores de IE, el comportamiento era, abrir una nueva ventana, y el javascript se ejecutaba correctamente como about:blank, pero en las mas recientes, aparece una nueva ventana, y se cierra instantaneamente, sin poder saber que ocurre. En safari el comportamiento es distinto, el navegador aparentemente intenta cargar una pelicula al clickear el recuadro, y queda vacio, pero no ejecuta el javascript.</p>
<p><strong>Actualización</strong>: HaDeS preparo y publico un pequeño <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GANTR7tqu8">video en youtube</a> demostrando la falla, y Google ha deshabilitado temporalmente esta caracteristica mientras solucionan el problema.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beford.org/2008/05/04/gmail-cross-site-scripting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Gadgets XSS (IE6/Opera)</title>
		<link>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/25/google-gadgets-xss-ie6/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/25/google-gadgets-xss-ie6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fernando M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xml]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beford.org/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a recent discussion on ha.ckers.org regarding a possible CSRF that could allow an attacker to inject an evil gadget on someobdy else&#8217;s iGoogle page. After checking the format of the xml file used to define the gadgets properties, &#8230; <a href="http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/25/google-gadgets-xss-ie6/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a recent discussion on <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20071119/google-gadgets-gaffe/">ha.ckers.org</a> regarding a possible CSRF that could allow an attacker to inject an evil gadget on someobdy else&#8217;s iGoogle page. After checking the format of the <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/asdf2.xml">xml file</a> used to define the gadgets properties, I noticed a couple of attributes that could be used as point of injections to active content, the <strong>thumbnail</strong> and <strong>screenshot </strong>attribute. Only one of them is vulnerable, the screenshot attribute, by using a javascript URI as value you can execute active content on certain browsers such as IE6. This is a poc that shows an alert with the current document.domain value:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/ig/adde?moduleurl=http://beford.org/stuff/ig.xml">www.google.com/ig/adde?moduleurl=http://beford.org/stuff/ig.xml</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just notified Google about this, to avoid been a target of this flaw you can switch to Mozilla Firefox (+Noscript), or upgrade to IE7, which is not an option for Windows 2000 users.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> According to a friend, Rafael, Opera users are vulnerable aswell, he sent me an screenshot which you can see here: <a href="http://blog.beford.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/ss.jpg" title="Opera Google XSS">Opera Google XSS.</a></p>
<p><strong>Update 2: </strong>Google fixed this on 27 November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/25/google-gadgets-xss-ie6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox jar: Protocol Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/10/firefox-jar-protocol-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/10/firefox-jar-protocol-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fernando M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gecko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beford.org/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just came across pdp&#8217;s finding jar protocol vulnerability on Mozilla Firefox, I think its a big issue, and the fact that it has been on bugzilla (#369814) for way more than ten fuck*ng days is not a good thing. &#8230; <a href="http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/10/firefox-jar-protocol-vulnerability/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across pdp&#8217;s finding <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/web-mayhem-firefoxs-jar-protocol-issues"> jar protocol vulnerability</a> on Mozilla Firefox, I think its a big issue, and the fact that it has been on <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369814">bugzilla (#369814)</a> for way more than <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20070803/mozilla-says-ten-fucking-days/">ten fuck*ng days</a> is not a good thing.</p>
<p>According to pdp, this issue makes vulnerable to Cross-site scripting applications that allow users uploading compressed ZIP, and JAR files. After a couple of minutes messing around the poc&#8217;s, I figured out that sites with open redirect issues are vulnerable too. I&#8217;ve created this poc that attacks Gmail, it&#8217;s based on my previous post and it will only show your contacts list, it&#8217;s not being logged server side or anything (as some people thought that my previous poc did. Credit to <a href="http://lowtechlive.com/">tx</a> for discovering the <a href="http://sla.ckers.org/forum/read.php?3,505,10958#msg-10958">open redirect issue</a> used to exploit Google / Firefox):</p>
<p><a href="http://beford.org/stuff/jarjarbinks.htm">http://beford.org/stuff/jarjarbinks.htm</a></p>
<p>Who&#8217;s fault? Both, <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20070520/phishing-through-google-yet-again/">Google</a> <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20070224/google-fixes-one-redirect-but-leaves-lots-of-others/">for</a> <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20061224/google-redirects-help-phishers-again/">having</a> <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20060822/google-redirection-hole-used-for-phishing/">open</a> <a href="http://sla.ckers.org/forum/read.php?3,505,page=3#msg-1349">redirect</a> issues and not fixing them, and Mozilla Corporation for failing to address this problem.</p>
<p>What can I do to protect myself? Giorgio Maone have already added protection against this flaw to <a href="http://noscript.net/getit#devel">NoScript development version</a>.</p>
<p><strong> Update: </strong>NoScript released stable version with Jar protection.  A new <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403331">bugzilla (#403331) </a>entry was created to fix the inappropiate redirect on jar protocol, according to the lastest comments and bug keyword, there seems to be a patch and will be availible with Firefox 2.0.0.10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/10/firefox-jar-protocol-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://blog.beford.org/2007/09/24/googlecom-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.beford.org/2007/09/24/googlecom-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fernando M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beford.org/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I found a new Google.com XSS vulnerability that can be abused to steal information from Gmail accounts, I&#8217;ve done responsible disclosure of at least 3 vulns to Google, but since I haven&#8217;t got enough &#8216;motivation&#8217;, I&#8217;ll go full disclosure &#8230; <a href="http://blog.beford.org/2007/09/24/googlecom-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, I found a new Google.com XSS vulnerability that can be abused to steal information from Gmail accounts, I&#8217;ve done responsible disclosure of at least 3 vulns to Google, but since I haven&#8217;t got enough &#8216;motivation&#8217;, I&#8217;ll go full disclosure now.</p>
<p>The vulnerability exists in Blogspot polls feature, I had already disclosed a vulnerability on this system. The &#8216;font&#8217; parameter was not being sanitized before being used inside an STYLE tag, so you could inject IE&#8217;s expression() and Mozilla&#8217;s -moz-binding. They fixed it, however they didn&#8217;t check enough the rest of the code, the new XSS is:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/reviews/polls/display/159769971366811755/blogger_template/vote?purl=blogspot.com%2F&amp;chrtclr=%23599be2&amp;hideq=false&amp;font=normal+normal+100%25+Helvetica%2CArial%2CVerdana%2C%20Trebuchet+MS%20%2C+Sans-serif&amp;u_tz=%22%3EXSS">Simple XSS POC</a></p>
<p>Since its Sunday and there is nothing else to do, I&#8217;ve created 2 more pocs, one of them, shows a your contacts, the  second one will make Gmail forward all new received emails to another email account,  no user interaction required, well you just need to open a website while still logged to Gmail.</p>
<p>POC1: <a href="http://beford.org/stuff/contacts.htm">http://beford.org/stuff/contacts.htm</a><br />
POC2: <a href="http://beford.org/stuff/gmail.htm">http://beford.org/stuff/gmail.htm</a></p>
<p>I have tested them under IE, Konqueror, Opera and Firefox, it should work on all of them. If you want to be protected against this kind of attacks, I&#8217;d highly recommend Firefox + <a href="http://noscript.net/">NoScript</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Google fixed this issue, I&#8217;d like to ask the people that looked at the second poc to disable forwarding if you have not done so, I&#8217;m still getting ton of email. This screenshot shows how to disable forwarding.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.beford.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/gmail.png" title="gmail.png"><img src="http://blog.beford.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/gmail.thumbnail.png" alt="gmail.png" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beford.org/2007/09/24/googlecom-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

