<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>stuff &#187; mozilla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.beford.org/tag/mozilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.beford.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3.6.19 Remote Code Execution</title>
		<link>http://blog.beford.org/2011/04/15/firefox-3-6-19-remote-code-execution/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.beford.org/2011/04/15/firefox-3-6-19-remote-code-execution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fernando M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beford.org/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be disclosed soon. &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.beford.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/minefield-icon.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-178" title="minefield-icon" src="http://blog.beford.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/minefield-icon.png" alt="" width="128" height="128" /></a></p>
<p>To be disclosed soon.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beford.org/2011/04/15/firefox-3-6-19-remote-code-execution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 2.0.0.10 released</title>
		<link>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/27/firefox-20010-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/27/firefox-20010-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fernando M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gecko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beford.org/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla Corporation just released Firefox 2.0.0.10 which includes fixes against JAR uri attacks. This issue affected browsers that used Gecko engine, a quick check showed me that only K-meleon browser was also updated, however there are several Gecko based web &#8230; <a href="http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/27/firefox-20010-released/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla Corporation just released <a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/es/products/firefox/2.0.0.10/releasenotes/">Firefox 2.0.0.10</a> which includes fixes against <a href="http://blog.beford.org/?p=8">JAR uri attacks</a>. This issue affected browsers that used Gecko engine, a quick check showed me that only <a href="http://kmeleon.sourceforge.net/">K-meleon</a> browser was also updated, however there are several Gecko based web browsers that need to get fixed: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_browsers#Gecko-based_browsers">Gecko-based browsers.</a></p>
<p><strong>Update: </strong>Let&#8217;s make that, Firefox 2.0.0.11, which also fixes some regressions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/27/firefox-20010-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox jar: Protocol Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/10/firefox-jar-protocol-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/10/firefox-jar-protocol-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fernando M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gecko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beford.org/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just came across pdp&#8217;s finding jar protocol vulnerability on Mozilla Firefox, I think its a big issue, and the fact that it has been on bugzilla (#369814) for way more than ten fuck*ng days is not a good thing. &#8230; <a href="http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/10/firefox-jar-protocol-vulnerability/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across pdp&#8217;s finding <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/web-mayhem-firefoxs-jar-protocol-issues"> jar protocol vulnerability</a> on Mozilla Firefox, I think its a big issue, and the fact that it has been on <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369814">bugzilla (#369814)</a> for way more than <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20070803/mozilla-says-ten-fucking-days/">ten fuck*ng days</a> is not a good thing.</p>
<p>According to pdp, this issue makes vulnerable to Cross-site scripting applications that allow users uploading compressed ZIP, and JAR files. After a couple of minutes messing around the poc&#8217;s, I figured out that sites with open redirect issues are vulnerable too. I&#8217;ve created this poc that attacks Gmail, it&#8217;s based on my previous post and it will only show your contacts list, it&#8217;s not being logged server side or anything (as some people thought that my previous poc did. Credit to <a href="http://lowtechlive.com/">tx</a> for discovering the <a href="http://sla.ckers.org/forum/read.php?3,505,10958#msg-10958">open redirect issue</a> used to exploit Google / Firefox):</p>
<p><a href="http://beford.org/stuff/jarjarbinks.htm">http://beford.org/stuff/jarjarbinks.htm</a></p>
<p>Who&#8217;s fault? Both, <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20070520/phishing-through-google-yet-again/">Google</a> <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20070224/google-fixes-one-redirect-but-leaves-lots-of-others/">for</a> <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20061224/google-redirects-help-phishers-again/">having</a> <a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20060822/google-redirection-hole-used-for-phishing/">open</a> <a href="http://sla.ckers.org/forum/read.php?3,505,page=3#msg-1349">redirect</a> issues and not fixing them, and Mozilla Corporation for failing to address this problem.</p>
<p>What can I do to protect myself? Giorgio Maone have already added protection against this flaw to <a href="http://noscript.net/getit#devel">NoScript development version</a>.</p>
<p><strong> Update: </strong>NoScript released stable version with Jar protection.  A new <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403331">bugzilla (#403331) </a>entry was created to fix the inappropiate redirect on jar protocol, according to the lastest comments and bug keyword, there seems to be a patch and will be availible with Firefox 2.0.0.10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beford.org/2007/11/10/firefox-jar-protocol-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

